Company snapshot
| Category | Internap | System73 |
|---|---|---|
| Status | defunct | active |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Website | — | — |
| Docs | — | — |
Overview
Internap Holding LLC, formerly Internap Corporation (INAP), was a provider of data center, cloud, and content delivery network (CDN) services, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Norcross, Georgia. Its CDN, once a key offering, leveraged the VitalStream platform and Managed Internet Route Optimizer (MIRO) for optimized content delivery. The company served enterprises, including IPTV providers like NetMax Media, with a focus on performance through its Private Network Access Points (P-NAP). In 2023, Internap rebranded to HorizonIQ, shifting focus to bare metal cloud and colocation services. Its CDN operations have been discontinued, and the company now operates as a cloud-focused business.
System73, founded in 2013 and headquartered in Santa Cruz, United States, with a registered entity in Malta, provides a MultiCDN platform focused on optimizing video streaming. Its Edge Intelligence solution uses AI to monitor and route traffic across multiple CDNs, improving Quality of Experience (QoE) and reducing costs. The platform serves content providers, particularly in live and VoD streaming, with a focus on scalability and cost efficiency. System73 has delivered high-profile events like the UEFA Champions League Final, achieving significant cost savings. Customers include OTT providers and broadcasters seeking reliable, high-quality streaming in regions with limited infrastructure.
Network & Architecture
—
System73 operates as a MultiCDN, leveraging a global network of partner CDNs without specifying its own Points of Presence (POPs). Its Edge Intelligence platform uses AI to monitor network conditions and select optimal routes, bypassing congestion. It excels in regions like Latin America, particularly Peru, where traditional CDN infrastructure is sparse. The platform employs peer-to-peer (P2P) technology to create centrally orchestrated content delivery trees, reducing reliance on physical CDN infrastructure. This approach supports scalability for high-traffic events but may face limitations in areas with low P2P adoption or restrictive network policies.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Internap | System73 |
|---|---|---|
waf | ✗ | ✗ |
bot_mitigation | ✗ | ✗ |
ddos | ✗ | ✗ |
rate_limit | ✗ | ✗ |
http3_quic | ✗ | ✗ |
tls13 | ✗ | ✗ |
tiered_cache | ✗ | ✗ |
origin_shield | ✗ | ✗ |
instant_purge | ✓ | ✗ |
stale_while_revalidate | ✗ | ✗ |
stale_if_error | ✗ | ✗ |
image_optimization | ✗ | ✗ |
video_vod | ✗ | ✓ |
video_live | ✗ | ✓ |
drm | ✗ | ✗ |
hls_dash_packaging | ✗ | ✗ |
websockets | ✗ | ✗ |
signed_urls | ✗ | ✗ |
edge_compute | ✗ | ✗ |
functions | ✗ | ✗ |
kv_storage | ✗ | ✗ |
api_first | ✓ | ✓ |
realtime_logs | ✓ | ✓ |
log_push | ✗ | ✗ |
terraform | ✗ | ✗ |
Legend: ✓ = Supported, ✗ = Not supported, — = Not listed
Pricing
—
System73 offers a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model, with reported costs as low as $2 per TB for scalable delivery, as seen in the UEFA Champions League Final case study. Pricing details are not fully public; interested parties must contact System73 directly for quotes. The platform emphasizes cost savings, claiming up to 65% reduction in delivery costs compared to traditional CDNs. No free tier or trial is explicitly mentioned. For detailed pricing, visit https://www.system73.com.
Integrations & DevEx
—
System73 provides an SDK for integration, supporting WebRTC DataChannel with fallback to CDN-only delivery for unsupported browsers. The API-first approach enables programmatic control of content delivery. Edge Analytics offers real-time dashboards for monitoring network and viewer data. No public support for Terraform, CI/CD pipelines, or migration tools is documented. The platform’s focus is on seamless integration for OTT and broadcasting services, with quick onboarding demonstrated in customer case studies.
When it fits
—
When it fits
- Ideal for OTT providers and broadcasters needing scalable, high-QoE video streaming, especially for live events like sports.
- Suits customers in regions with limited CDN infrastructure, such as Latin America, due to P2P-enhanced delivery.
- Fits businesses seeking cost-efficient MultiCDN solutions with real-time analytics and API-driven control.
When it doesn’t
- Less suitable for applications requiring WAF, DDoS protection, or image optimization, as these are not documented features.
- May not fit small-scale projects or those needing a free tier, as pricing requires direct contact and no trial is mentioned.
- Not ideal for use cases needing edge compute or advanced caching features like tiered cache or instant purge, which lack public support.
When it doesn’t
—
—
History & Notes
Internap’s CDN, built on VitalStream and MIRO, was a notable player in the 2000s, with expansions in London, Tokyo, and Hong Kong. Financial challenges, including a $99.7M goodwill writedown in 2008 and multiple bankruptcies, led to asset sales and a pivot away from CDN services. The 2022 ransomware attack on ServerIntellect further disrupted its hosting operations, prompting the final shift to HorizonIQ. No official EOL notice for the CDN is publicly available, but the rebranding and asset sales indicate a complete exit from the CDN market.
—