Company snapshot

CategoryCDN77System73
Statusactiveactive
Founded
Headquarters
Website
Docs

Overview

CDN77 is a global content delivery network (CDN) provider based in London, founded in 2011. It operates a network with over 200 Tbps capacity across six continents, delivering approximately 175 petabytes of data daily, with a primary focus on video content, which constitutes about 90% of its traffic. The company serves a range of clients, including websites, gaming platforms, and streaming services, offering features like DDoS protection and real-time analytics. CDN77 is noted for its infrastructure services and content delivery, supporting major websites and applications worldwide.
System73, founded in 2013 and headquartered in Santa Cruz, United States, with a registered entity in Malta, provides a MultiCDN platform focused on optimizing video streaming. Its Edge Intelligence solution uses AI to monitor and route traffic across multiple CDNs, improving Quality of Experience (QoE) and reducing costs. The platform serves content providers, particularly in live and VoD streaming, with a focus on scalability and cost efficiency. System73 has delivered high-profile events like the UEFA Champions League Final, achieving significant cost savings. Customers include OTT providers and broadcasters seeking reliable, high-quality streaming in regions with limited infrastructure.

Network & Architecture

CDN77 maintains a global network with over 20,000 servers and points of presence (PoPs) across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Its infrastructure supports a capacity of 200 Tbps, with robust peering and routing optimized for low latency. The network is particularly strong in Europe and North America, with recent expansions in Asia through partnerships like Exa Infrastructure for 400G and 100G wavelengths. While it has comprehensive global coverage, its presence in Africa and certain parts of APAC may be less dense compared to competitors like Cloudflare or Akamai.
System73 operates as a MultiCDN, leveraging a global network of partner CDNs without specifying its own Points of Presence (POPs). Its Edge Intelligence platform uses AI to monitor network conditions and select optimal routes, bypassing congestion. It excels in regions like Latin America, particularly Peru, where traditional CDN infrastructure is sparse. The platform employs peer-to-peer (P2P) technology to create centrally orchestrated content delivery trees, reducing reliance on physical CDN infrastructure. This approach supports scalability for high-traffic events but may face limitations in areas with low P2P adoption or restrictive network policies.

Feature comparison

FeatureCDN77System73
waf
bot_mitigation
ddos
rate_limit
http3_quic
tls13
tiered_cache
origin_shield
instant_purge
stale_while_revalidate
stale_if_error
image_optimization
video_vod
video_live
drm
hls_dash_packaging
websockets
signed_urls
edge_compute
functions
kv_storage
api_first
realtime_logs
log_push
terraform

Legend: ✓ = Supported, ✗ = Not supported, — = Not listed

Pricing

CDN77 operates on a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model with no long-term commitments, making it accessible for various business sizes. Pricing is traffic-based, with per-GB rates available but not publicly detailed; for example, high-volume plans are tailored for enterprise clients. A free trial is offered for testing services. Full pricing details are available at https://www.cdn77.com/pricing.
System73 offers a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model, with reported costs as low as $2 per TB for scalable delivery, as seen in the UEFA Champions League Final case study. Pricing details are not fully public; interested parties must contact System73 directly for quotes. The platform emphasizes cost savings, claiming up to 65% reduction in delivery costs compared to traditional CDNs. No free tier or trial is explicitly mentioned. For detailed pricing, visit https://www.system73.com.

Integrations & DevEx

CDN77 supports an API-first approach with comprehensive APIs for managing services, including content purging and analytics. Real-time logs and analytics are available, with log-push capabilities for integration with external systems. While Terraform support is not explicitly documented, the platform offers SDKs and tools for developers to automate configurations. Migration tools are available to assist with onboarding from other CDNs, and the client portal provides detailed analytics for monitoring performance.
System73 provides an SDK for integration, supporting WebRTC DataChannel with fallback to CDN-only delivery for unsupported browsers. The API-first approach enables programmatic control of content delivery. Edge Analytics offers real-time dashboards for monitoring network and viewer data. No public support for Terraform, CI/CD pipelines, or migration tools is documented. The platform’s focus is on seamless integration for OTT and broadcasting services, with quick onboarding demonstrated in customer case studies.

When it fits

  • Suitable for video-heavy workloads, such as streaming platforms or VOD services, due to its robust video delivery features.
  • Ideal for gaming companies needing low-latency content delivery and DDoS protection for global audiences.
  • Fits businesses seeking a PAYG model with flexible scaling and no long-term contracts.
  • When it fits

  • Ideal for OTT providers and broadcasters needing scalable, high-QoE video streaming, especially for live events like sports.
  • Suits customers in regions with limited CDN infrastructure, such as Latin America, due to P2P-enhanced delivery.
  • Fits businesses seeking cost-efficient MultiCDN solutions with real-time analytics and API-driven control.
  • When it doesn’t

  • Less suitable for applications requiring WAF, DDoS protection, or image optimization, as these are not documented features.
  • May not fit small-scale projects or those needing a free tier, as pricing requires direct contact and no trial is mentioned.
  • Not ideal for use cases needing edge compute or advanced caching features like tiered cache or instant purge, which lack public support.

When it doesn’t

  • May not be the best choice for organizations requiring advanced WAF or bot mitigation, as these features are not currently offered.
  • Less optimal for users needing extensive edge compute functions or key-value storage, which are limited compared to competitors like Fastly.
  • Smaller presence in Africa or niche APAC regions may limit performance for highly localized traffic.

History & Notes