Company snapshot
| Category | BlazingCDN | TurboBytes |
|---|---|---|
| Status | active | defunct |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Website | — | — |
| Docs | — | — |
Overview
BlazingCDN is a content delivery network provider focused on delivering video, gaming, and large file content with global coverage. It serves businesses of various sizes, including media, gaming, and software companies, by offering solutions for video-on-demand, live streaming, and static content acceleration. The service emphasizes straightforward pricing and a user-friendly dashboard for managing CDN zones and analytics. Its infrastructure supports high-traffic projects, with a network designed to minimize latency for end users.
TurboBytes was a MultiCDN platform founded in 2012 that optimized content delivery by dynamically routing traffic across multiple CDNs based on real-time performance metrics. It served publishers, e-commerce, and content providers seeking improved speed and reliability globally. The platform measured CDN performance from within users’ browsers and automatically selected the best-performing CDN for each region. TurboBytes is no longer operational, having been marked as a deadpooled company. No official announcement confirms the exact date of closure, but the company is considered defunct as of 2025.
Network & Architecture
BlazingCDN operates over 25 points of presence (PoPs) globally, with 50 GBps uplink per server and a total network capacity exceeding 10 Tbps. It uses Anycast routing to optimize content delivery by directing traffic to the nearest server. The network has strong coverage in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America, but lacks PoPs in Africa and the Middle East. Its architecture supports a private global backbone with 4.5 petabytes of cached files and an average latency of 27 ms in the USA and EU.
—
Feature comparison
| Feature | BlazingCDN | TurboBytes |
|---|---|---|
waf | ✗ | ✗ |
bot_mitigation | ✗ | ✗ |
ddos | ✓ | ✗ |
rate_limit | ✗ | ✗ |
http3_quic | ✓ | ✗ |
tls13 | ✓ | ✗ |
tiered_cache | ✓ | ✗ |
origin_shield | ✗ | ✗ |
instant_purge | ✓ | ✓ |
stale_while_revalidate | ✗ | ✗ |
stale_if_error | ✗ | ✗ |
image_optimization | ✗ | ✗ |
video_vod | ✓ | ✗ |
video_live | ✓ | ✗ |
drm | ✗ | ✗ |
hls_dash_packaging | ✓ | ✗ |
websockets | ✗ | ✗ |
signed_urls | ✓ | ✗ |
edge_compute | ✗ | ✗ |
functions | ✗ | ✗ |
kv_storage | ✗ | ✗ |
api_first | ✓ | ✓ |
realtime_logs | ✓ | ✓ |
log_push | ✓ | ✗ |
terraform | ✗ | ✗ |
Legend: ✓ = Supported, ✗ = Not supported, — = Not listed
Pricing
BlazingCDN offers pay-as-you-go pricing starting at $5 per TB, dropping to $1.5 per TB for higher usage, with a minimum monthly cost of $25 for 5 terabytes. Enterprise plans are available for projects exceeding 25 TB. A 14-day trial is provided for testing. Pricing details are available at https://blazingcdn.com/pricing/.
—
Integrations & DevEx
BlazingCDN provides an API-first platform with a user-friendly dashboard for managing CDN zones, custom domains, and analytics. It supports integration with object storage and tools like Cyberduck for file uploads via Swift protocol. Real-time analytics and log push enable monitoring and debugging. Migration support is offered with 24/7 SLA monitoring, though Terraform and other IaC tools are not explicitly supported. Documentation is available at https://help.blazingcdn.com/.
—
When it fits
- Businesses needing affordable CDN for video streaming, gaming, or large file delivery with global reach.
- Small to medium-sized companies seeking simple setup and transparent pay-as-you-go pricing.
- Projects requiring low-latency content delivery in North America, Europe, or Asia-Pacific.
—
When it doesn’t
- Organizations needing coverage in Africa or the Middle East due to absent PoPs.
- Users requiring advanced WAF, bot mitigation, or edge compute capabilities not offered.
- Enterprises needing extensive third-party integrations or Terraform support for infrastructure automation.
—
History & Notes
—
TurboBytes was noted for its innovative approach to MultiCDN, leveraging real-time performance data to optimize content delivery. Its closure is not well-documented, with no public statements from the company or successors. Industry sources like Crunchbase and Tracxn confirm its defunct status, but conflicting reports or partial revivals are absent. The lack of an official website or archived documentation limits further insights into its operational history.